Australia's High Court rules on ISP's liability for user infringements

›
Author: Rebecca Giblin (Lecturer, Monash Law School, Australia) Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd [2012] HCA 16, 20 April 2012 Journal...

A principle of general application?

›
Author: Darren Smyth (EIP, London) Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Genentech Inc [2012] EWHC 657 (Pat), Patents Court, England and Wales, ...

Prometheus fails to steal fire from the Gods

›
Author: Jonathan Moss (Hogarth Chambers) Mayo Collaborative Services v Prometheus Laboratories (US Supreme Court), 566 U.S. __ (2012), 20...

July JIPLP: an Africa-oriented editorial

›
Although June is still a relatively young month, the online version of the July issue of the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Pra...
1 comment:

News from a sister publication

›
While JIPLP focuses primarily on intellectual property and practice, that discipline shades into other areas of law and practice -- and th...

Pre-filing disclosure of an invention is found to be in breach of equitable doctrine of confidence

›
Author: Saadat Nisar (Calleja Consulting Limited) Threeway Pressings Ltd, UK Intellectual Property Office, BL O/124/12, 20 March 2012 J...
1 comment:

Congratulations to a distinguished contributor

›
Over the past few years, readers of the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice have often had the opportunity to appreciate ...

Some bits and pieces

›
First, a quick reminder for subscribers to the printed version of JIPLP: the June 2012 issue (contents here ) has already been dispatched an...

I may have driven a BEETLE motor car: but I won't be using a BEATLE wheelchair!

›
Author: Sally Cooper (Trade Mark Attorney) You-Q BV v OHIM with Apple Corps Ltd intervening , Case T-369/10, General Court (Eighth Court),...

GTI: descriptive or not?

›
Author: Chris Pett: Dehns Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys, Brighton Volkswagen AG v OHIM, Case T-63/09, General Court, 21 March 2012 Jo...
2 comments: