The March 2015 issue looks like this:
The blog of the Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice. Here's where editorial panellists, readers and contributors can come together and share their views on all aspects of IP law and practice. Join us!
Editorial
- Eleonora Rosati
2015: the year of blocking injunctions?
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2015) 10 (3): 147 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu253Current Intelligence
- Eddy Ventose
Patents: Patent protection for isolated genes in Australia
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2015) 10 (3): 148-150 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu242
- Suraj Attri
Patents: Accidental omission of corresponding patent information and revocation in India
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2015) 10 (3): 150-151 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu246
- Aredhel Johnson
Patents: The beginning of the end for the UK Patent Box?
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2015) 10 (3): 152-153 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu251
- Darren Smyth,
- Robert Barker
- and Timothy Belcher
Patents: Rage against the (translation) machine
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2015) 10 (3): 153-154 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu257
- Sean McManis
Trade marks: ZIMA found to be inherently registrable for tomatoes
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2015) 10 (3): 154-155 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu241
- Richard Milchior
Trade marks: How to prove if a shoe is protected by copyright—and who owns it?
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2015) 10 (3): 156-157 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu243
- Sema Salman
Trade marks: Third party's abusive BENFICA trade mark rejected for notoriety and bad faith
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2015) 10 (3): 157-158 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu245
- Althaf Marsoof
Trade marks: Blocking injunctions protect trade mark rights on the internet
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2015) 10 (3): 158-164 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu240
- Michael Browne and
- Maeve Lynch
Trade marks: Interflora: a pyrrhic victory as both parties return to the drawing board
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2015) 10 (3): 164-166 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu249Articles
- Ralph Cox and
- Simon Spink
UK claim construction: return of the Protocol questions and file wrapper estoppel
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2015) 10 (3): 167-169 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu225
- Andrew Mullane,
- Craig Humphris
- and Todd Shand
Interlocutory injunction applications in Australia
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2015) 10 (3): 170-179 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu244
- Mark Marfé,
- Alexander Reetz,
- Camille Pecnard,
- Riccardo Fruscalzo
- and Ruud van der Velden
The power of national courts and the Unified Patent Court to grant injunctions: a comparative study
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2015) 10 (3): 180-190 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu254
- Toby Headdon
Browsing through the looking glass: from copyright to wonderland?
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2015) 10 (3): 191-197 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu255
- Kanchana Kariyawasam,
- Shigeo Takakura
- and Nobuhide Ottomo
Legal implications and patentability of human stem cells: Australia and Japan compared
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2015) 10 (3): 198-209 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu256From GRUR Int.
- Frederik Thiering
Cases before the CJEU and the BGH on trade mark law since 2013
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2015) 10 (3): 210-219 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpv005
- Gert Würtenberger
German Federal Supreme Court, 18 September 2014 - I ZR 228/12 Gelbe Wörterbücher [Yellow Dictionaries]
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2015) 10 (3): 220-222 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu248IP in Review
- Míchel Olmedo Cuevas
The law in the panels
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2015) 10 (3): 223-224 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu247
- Birgit Clark
Vorsprung through legal technique: ‘Eisenführ/Schennen’ commentary on the Community Trade Mark Regulation
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2015) 10 (3): 224-225 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu250
No comments:
Post a Comment