JIPLP: Reviews in review!

Reviews in review!

The Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice (JIPLP), like many other journals, carries reviews. These have not been limited to books alone but have embraced the occasional film, article, weblog and even advertisement. Some reviews are short and pithy, but others have been the length of full articles, depending on their importance or topicality. The review section, skilfully developed by Reviews Editor Phillip Johnson since the journal's inception in 2005, is respected for its sagacity, its variety and its integrity.

As part of its ongoing policy of listening to readers' comments and seeking to match their interests, JIPLP would like to hear from you on the following issues:

(i) are you happy with the proportion of JIPLP which is dedicated to reviews?

(ii) do you think that reviews should be made more current by appearing online, on the JIPLP website or on this weblog, rather than (or as well as) appearing in print at a later date?

(iii) do think that the range of items which JIPLP reviews is too broad, too narrow or just right?

(iv) do you have any other ideas for enhancing the review section?

(v) would you be interested in writing a review, should an appropriate opportunity arise?

Please get in touch by emailing here, with the subject line "JIPLP Reviews".

No comments:

About this weblog

The principal contents of this weblog are drawn from the Current Intelligence features which are published monthly in JIPLP.

Current Intelligence articles are designed to analyse recent key cases, legislation and topical matters. Normally they are of between 500 and 1,500 words (though in exceptional cases a greater word length may be agreed with the Editors).

The selected Current Intelligence articles are now posted on this weblog to enable readers to engage with them, posting comments if they so choose. All comments are moderated, which means that they will not appear immediately upon their being posted.

About the Journal

JIPLP is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to intellectual property law and practice. Published monthly, coverage includes the full range of substantive IP topics, practice-related matters such as litigation, enforcement, drafting and transactions, plus relevant aspects of related subjects such as competition and world trade law.

The journal is specifically designed for IP lawyers, patent attorneys and trade mark attorneys both in private practice and working in industry. It also aims to be an essential source of reference for academics specialising in IP, members of the judiciary, officials in IP registries and regulatory bodies, and institutional libraries. Subject-matter covered is chosen for its practical relevance and international interest.

Instructions for authors here
Free sample issue here
Subscription details here

... and authors in search of an article

JIPLP is often approached by prospective authors who would like to write something, but who would appreciate guidance regarding subject-matter, style and so forth. Here are a few pointers:

* Ask yourself what is it that you'd like to read in the journal, since that is handy rule of thumb which probably reflects the interests of your colleagues and your competitors;

* IP law and practice is very much a 'here and now' activity for JIPLP subscribers. The history of a right may be inherently interesting, or even sometimes relevant to the resolution of a specific issue, but would you expect a reader to look for it in JIPLP?

* Recycled Masters' dissertations and university essays make poor articles and are often difficult to convert from a piece that is designed to display erudition and research ability into an article that addresses lawyers, businesses and decision-makers. It's usually easier to start afresh by working out who your readers are and what you want to tell them.

* Please comply with the authors' instructions and note the journal's preferred length for articles. Most authors like to publish long ones, but subscribers tend to prefer reading shorter ones.

Reviews in review!

No comments:

Post a Comment