JIPLP: July JIPLP now online: check it out!

July JIPLP now online: check it out!

The July 2014 issue of the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (JIPLP) is now available online to those folk who have subscribed to the electronic edition. The printed version will be out in a couple of weeks. As usual, non-subscribers can purchase temporary access to articles and Current Intelligence notes via the JIPLP website, here. This month's Editorial will be posted on this weblog in the near future.

Editorial

Select this article

Karsten Königer

The published patent application – a basis for injunctive relief?
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 533 first published online May 23, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu098

Current Intelligence

Select this article

Tyrone Berger

Patents: Australian Federal Court clarifies statutory termination rights in patent licence agreement
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 534-535 first published onlineMay 9, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu077

Select this article

Gian Paolo Di Santo

Pfizer's misuse of patent/SPC rights results in an abuse of dominant position
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 535-537 first published onlineMay 19, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu076

Select this article

John Syekei and

David Opijah

Contradictions in time limitation in revocation of a granted patent under Kenya law
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 537-538 first published onlineMay 22, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu091

Select this article

Matthew Jones

Application for central amendment of a patent after revocation at first instance does not of itself render an appeal an abuse of process
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 538-540 first published onlineJune 4, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu074

Select this article

Stefano Barazza

Burden of proving infringement in declaratory judgment actions of non-infringement remains with the patentee
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 540-542 first published onlineApril 29, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu066

Select this article

Birgit Clark

Trade marks: Impossible (im)position? General Court refuses registration of teddy maker Steiff's position mark
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 542-543 first published onlineApril 16, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu049

Select this article

Mark Williams

Snorkel decision breathes life into quasi design protection
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 543-544 first published onlineMay 7, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu067

Select this article

Birgit Clark

Between a rock and a hard place? Bundesgerichtshof decides Hard Rock Café trade mark dispute
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 544-546 first published onlineMay 15, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu078

Select this article

Jeremy Blum and

Nicholas Round

Boop oop a doop—protection for cartoon image of Betty Boop
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 546-548 first published onlineApril 29, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu068

Select this article

Paul Stevens

Copyright: A hyperlink can be both a permissible and an infringing act at the same time
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 548-549 first published onlineJune 4, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu087

Select this article

Tina Gausling

Designs: German Federal Supreme Court expands design protection: ‘Birthday Train’
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 549-550 first published onlineMay 13, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu079

Select this article

Karen Dyekjaer

Customs: Internet sales into the EU of fake ‘replicas’
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 550-551 first published onlineMay 7, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu065

Articles

Select this article

Stefano Barazza

Licensing standard essential patents, part two: the availability of injunctive relief
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 552-564 first published onlineApril 11, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu005

Select this article

Nick Gardner

Mediation and its relevance to intellectual property disputes
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 565-574 first published onlineApril 30, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu063

Select this article

Winfried Tilmann

The Transitional Period of the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 575-584 first published onlineApril 25, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu025

Select this article

Eleonora Rosati

Copyright in the EU: in search of (in)flexibilities
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 585-598 first published onlineMarch 28, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu034

Select this article

Mike Snodin

Three CJEU decisions that answer some questions but pose many more
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 599-604 first published onlineApril 22, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu064

From GRUR Int.

Select this article

Michael Loschelder

Generalizations in the wording of a patent claim
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 605-606 first published onlineMay 27, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu085

Select this article

Claire Lehr and

Gabriele Engels

Taking a position
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 607-614 first published onlineMay 12, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu084

IP in Review

Select this article

Daniel Joy and

Birgit Clark

@WIPO—#Twitter account review
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 615-616 first published onlineMay 12, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu081

Select this article

John Peter Neophytou

Intellectual property and finance
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2014) 9 (7): 616-617 first published onlineMay 14, 2014 doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu080

No comments:

About this weblog

The principal contents of this weblog are drawn from the Current Intelligence features which are published monthly in JIPLP.

Current Intelligence articles are designed to analyse recent key cases, legislation and topical matters. Normally they are of between 500 and 1,500 words (though in exceptional cases a greater word length may be agreed with the Editors).

The selected Current Intelligence articles are now posted on this weblog to enable readers to engage with them, posting comments if they so choose. All comments are moderated, which means that they will not appear immediately upon their being posted.

About the Journal

JIPLP is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to intellectual property law and practice. Published monthly, coverage includes the full range of substantive IP topics, practice-related matters such as litigation, enforcement, drafting and transactions, plus relevant aspects of related subjects such as competition and world trade law.

The journal is specifically designed for IP lawyers, patent attorneys and trade mark attorneys both in private practice and working in industry. It also aims to be an essential source of reference for academics specialising in IP, members of the judiciary, officials in IP registries and regulatory bodies, and institutional libraries. Subject-matter covered is chosen for its practical relevance and international interest.

Instructions for authors here
Free sample issue here
Subscription details here

... and authors in search of an article

JIPLP is often approached by prospective authors who would like to write something, but who would appreciate guidance regarding subject-matter, style and so forth. Here are a few pointers:

* Ask yourself what is it that you'd like to read in the journal, since that is handy rule of thumb which probably reflects the interests of your colleagues and your competitors;

* IP law and practice is very much a 'here and now' activity for JIPLP subscribers. The history of a right may be inherently interesting, or even sometimes relevant to the resolution of a specific issue, but would you expect a reader to look for it in JIPLP?

* Recycled Masters' dissertations and university essays make poor articles and are often difficult to convert from a piece that is designed to display erudition and research ability into an article that addresses lawyers, businesses and decision-makers. It's usually easier to start afresh by working out who your readers are and what you want to tell them.

* Please comply with the authors' instructions and note the journal's preferred length for articles. Most authors like to publish long ones, but subscribers tend to prefer reading shorter ones.

JIPLP

July JIPLP now online: check it out!

Editorial

The published patent application – a basis for injunctive relief?

Current Intelligence

Patents: Australian Federal Court clarifies statutory termination rights in patent licence agreement

Pfizer's misuse of patent/SPC rights results in an abuse of dominant position

Contradictions in time limitation in revocation of a granted patent under Kenya law

Application for central amendment of a patent after revocation at first instance does not of itself render an appeal an abuse of process

Burden of proving infringement in declaratory judgment actions of non-infringement remains with the patentee

Trade marks: Impossible (im)position? General Court refuses registration of teddy maker Steiff's position mark

Snorkel decision breathes life into quasi design protection

Between a rock and a hard place? Bundesgerichtshof decides Hard Rock Café trade mark dispute

Boop oop a doop—protection for cartoon image of Betty Boop

Copyright: A hyperlink can be both a permissible and an infringing act at the same time

Designs: German Federal Supreme Court expands design protection: ‘Birthday Train’

Customs: Internet sales into the EU of fake ‘replicas’

Articles

Licensing standard essential patents, part two: the availability of injunctive relief

Mediation and its relevance to intellectual property disputes

The Transitional Period of the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court

Copyright in the EU: in search of (in)flexibilities

Three CJEU decisions that answer some questions but pose many more

From GRUR Int.

Generalizations in the wording of a patent claim

Taking a position

IP in Review

@WIPO—#Twitter account review

Intellectual property and finance

No comments:

Post a Comment