JIPLP: June issue of JIPLP is out

About this weblog

The principal contents of this weblog are drawn from the Current Intelligence features which are published monthly in JIPLP.

Current Intelligence articles are designed to analyse recent key cases, legislation and topical matters. Normally they are of between 500 and 1,500 words (though in exceptional cases a greater word length may be agreed with the Editors).

The selected Current Intelligence articles are now posted on this weblog to enable readers to engage with them, posting comments if they so choose. All comments are moderated, which means that they will not appear immediately upon their being posted.

About the Journal

JIPLP is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to intellectual property law and practice. Published monthly, coverage includes the full range of substantive IP topics, practice-related matters such as litigation, enforcement, drafting and transactions, plus relevant aspects of related subjects such as competition and world trade law.

The journal is specifically designed for IP lawyers, patent attorneys and trade mark attorneys both in private practice and working in industry. It also aims to be an essential source of reference for academics specialising in IP, members of the judiciary, officials in IP registries and regulatory bodies, and institutional libraries. Subject-matter covered is chosen for its practical relevance and international interest.

Instructions for authors here
Free sample issue here
Subscription details here

... and authors in search of an article

JIPLP is often approached by prospective authors who would like to write something, but who would appreciate guidance regarding subject-matter, style and so forth. Here are a few pointers:

* Ask yourself what is it that you'd like to read in the journal, since that is handy rule of thumb which probably reflects the interests of your colleagues and your competitors;

* IP law and practice is very much a 'here and now' activity for JIPLP subscribers. The history of a right may be inherently interesting, or even sometimes relevant to the resolution of a specific issue, but would you expect a reader to look for it in JIPLP?

* Recycled Masters' dissertations and university essays make poor articles and are often difficult to convert from a piece that is designed to display erudition and research ability into an article that addresses lawyers, businesses and decision-makers. It's usually easier to start afresh by working out who your readers are and what you want to tell them.

* Please comply with the authors' instructions and note the journal's preferred length for articles. Most authors like to publish long ones, but subscribers tend to prefer reading shorter ones.

JIPLP

June issue of JIPLP is out

Volume 14, Issue 6, June 2019

EDITORIAL

Artificial Intelligence & copyright: Section 9(3) or authorship without an author

CURRENT INTELLIGENCE

Liability of Indian e-commerce websites for trade mark infringement by sellers

Milan court grants suppliers of luxury cosmetics interim relief against infringers of selective distribution networks

Digitisation of art in the public domain–museum urges Wikimedia to take down reproductions of out-of-protection artworks

Delhi High Court rules on copyrightability of mechanical compilations: implications for Big Data?

Review Board of US Copyright Office confirms refusal to register blank form with some text due to insufficient originality

Turkey introduces mandatory civil mediation for commercial cases including IP rights

PRACTICE POINT

Strategies for medicinal product SPCs in Europe

ARTICLES

The not-so-secret secret to trade secret protection in China

To what extent does Uganda’s Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Act 2006 incorporate the TRIPS Agreement’s standards?

Intellectual property law and parodies in the fashion industry

How the Nigerian Supreme Court finally resolved the copyright collective management organizations’ locus standi conundrum

Are patent assertion entities a threat to Europe?

FROM GRUR INT.

Pregabalin and Fulvestrant - a comparison of German and English liability regimes for Swiss-type claims in light of current case law

Joint liability in Germany for patent infringement committed abroad

IP IN REVIEW

An impressive synthesis …

A practical guide to the copyright and competition law aspects of transnational licencing

A reasoned and reasonable argument to untangle the derivative works right

No comments:

Post a Comment