JIPLP: October JIPLP now online

About this weblog

The principal contents of this weblog are drawn from the Current Intelligence features which are published monthly in JIPLP.

Current Intelligence articles are designed to analyse recent key cases, legislation and topical matters. Normally they are of between 500 and 1,500 words (though in exceptional cases a greater word length may be agreed with the Editors).

The selected Current Intelligence articles are now posted on this weblog to enable readers to engage with them, posting comments if they so choose. All comments are moderated, which means that they will not appear immediately upon their being posted.

About the Journal

JIPLP is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to intellectual property law and practice. Published monthly, coverage includes the full range of substantive IP topics, practice-related matters such as litigation, enforcement, drafting and transactions, plus relevant aspects of related subjects such as competition and world trade law.

The journal is specifically designed for IP lawyers, patent attorneys and trade mark attorneys both in private practice and working in industry. It also aims to be an essential source of reference for academics specialising in IP, members of the judiciary, officials in IP registries and regulatory bodies, and institutional libraries. Subject-matter covered is chosen for its practical relevance and international interest.

Instructions for authors here
Free sample issue here
Subscription details here

... and authors in search of an article

JIPLP is often approached by prospective authors who would like to write something, but who would appreciate guidance regarding subject-matter, style and so forth. Here are a few pointers:

* Ask yourself what is it that you'd like to read in the journal, since that is handy rule of thumb which probably reflects the interests of your colleagues and your competitors;

* IP law and practice is very much a 'here and now' activity for JIPLP subscribers. The history of a right may be inherently interesting, or even sometimes relevant to the resolution of a specific issue, but would you expect a reader to look for it in JIPLP?

* Recycled Masters' dissertations and university essays make poor articles and are often difficult to convert from a piece that is designed to display erudition and research ability into an article that addresses lawyers, businesses and decision-makers. It's usually easier to start afresh by working out who your readers are and what you want to tell them.

* Please comply with the authors' instructions and note the journal's preferred length for articles. Most authors like to publish long ones, but subscribers tend to prefer reading shorter ones.

JIPLP

October JIPLP now online

Guest Editorial

Baby^™ — a not quite serious look at motherhood and brands

Current Intelligence

Patents: Indian Patent Office issues draft guidelines on examination of computer implemented inventions

Patents: United States Supreme Court affirms plant patentee's rights

Patents: Marriage ends, but patent interest endures

Trade marks: Colour can constitute a valid trade mark, says Canada's Federal Court

Trade marks: Infringement of selective distribution networks for the marketing of branded products as unfair competition practices

Trade marks: No bed of roses for M&S in Interflora keyword dispute

Copyright: Pirates sunk! Human Rights Court dismisses The Pirate Bay appeal

Copyright: The US Court of Appeals considers transformative use in Cariou v Prince: how far is too far?

Designs: EU General Court finds registered design invalid owing to an earlier Community trade mark

Geographical indications: Argentine courts validates GI ‘La Rioja Argentina’ against challenge from Spain

Trade secrets: Knowledge a key factor for liability for trade secrets misuse

Image rights: A Guide to Guernsey image rights

Media monitoring, copyright and technology: implications of recent cases

The transit dilemma revisited: the new Customs Regulation and the legislative package on trade marks

Incremental pharmaceutical innovation in India: the Supreme Court's judgment in the Novartis Gleevec case

From GRUR Int.

The Unified Patent Court: claims for information and protection of confidential information

Liability of search engine operator for autocomplete suggestions that infringe rights of privacy - “Autocomplete” function

IP in Review

Africa's contributions to intellectual property developments on the continent and beyond

No comments:

Post a Comment