JIPLP: Of ACTA, the CJEU and copyright enforcement

Of ACTA, the CJEU and copyright enforcement

"Copyright enforcement in the digital age: a post-ACTA view on the balancing of fundamental rights" is the title of another IP article published in one of JIPLP's sister journals. Written by Irina Baraliuc, Sari Depreeuw and Serge Gutwirth (all of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium), this article is to be published in the Spring 2013 issue of the International Journal of Law and Information Technology (IJLIT). According to its abstract:

"The ratification process of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) in the European Union has raised many (academic and non-academic) questions on various aspects of the enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPR), one of them being the relation between copyright enforcement and the fundamental rights of (alleged) infringers.

In this article, we analyse this relation in the context of the existing European framework, with particular attention for the pertinent decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). We then assess whether the measures proposed in ACTA upset the balance set by the CJEU. While the rejection of ACTA by the European Parliament seems to relieve the most imminent threats, the review of the IPR Enforcement directive and other Commission initiatives, including bilateral agreements, should keep the discussion alive".

No comments:

About this weblog

The principal contents of this weblog are drawn from the Current Intelligence features which are published monthly in JIPLP.

Current Intelligence articles are designed to analyse recent key cases, legislation and topical matters. Normally they are of between 500 and 1,500 words (though in exceptional cases a greater word length may be agreed with the Editors).

The selected Current Intelligence articles are now posted on this weblog to enable readers to engage with them, posting comments if they so choose. All comments are moderated, which means that they will not appear immediately upon their being posted.

About the Journal

JIPLP is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to intellectual property law and practice. Published monthly, coverage includes the full range of substantive IP topics, practice-related matters such as litigation, enforcement, drafting and transactions, plus relevant aspects of related subjects such as competition and world trade law.

The journal is specifically designed for IP lawyers, patent attorneys and trade mark attorneys both in private practice and working in industry. It also aims to be an essential source of reference for academics specialising in IP, members of the judiciary, officials in IP registries and regulatory bodies, and institutional libraries. Subject-matter covered is chosen for its practical relevance and international interest.

Instructions for authors here
Free sample issue here
Subscription details here

... and authors in search of an article

JIPLP is often approached by prospective authors who would like to write something, but who would appreciate guidance regarding subject-matter, style and so forth. Here are a few pointers:

* Ask yourself what is it that you'd like to read in the journal, since that is handy rule of thumb which probably reflects the interests of your colleagues and your competitors;

* IP law and practice is very much a 'here and now' activity for JIPLP subscribers. The history of a right may be inherently interesting, or even sometimes relevant to the resolution of a specific issue, but would you expect a reader to look for it in JIPLP?

* Recycled Masters' dissertations and university essays make poor articles and are often difficult to convert from a piece that is designed to display erudition and research ability into an article that addresses lawyers, businesses and decision-makers. It's usually easier to start afresh by working out who your readers are and what you want to tell them.

* Please comply with the authors' instructions and note the journal's preferred length for articles. Most authors like to publish long ones, but subscribers tend to prefer reading shorter ones.

Of ACTA, the CJEU and copyright enforcement

No comments:

Post a Comment