JIPLP: July issue available onlne -- and here are the contents

About this weblog

The principal contents of this weblog are drawn from the Current Intelligence features which are published monthly in JIPLP.

Current Intelligence articles are designed to analyse recent key cases, legislation and topical matters. Normally they are of between 500 and 1,500 words (though in exceptional cases a greater word length may be agreed with the Editors).

The selected Current Intelligence articles are now posted on this weblog to enable readers to engage with them, posting comments if they so choose. All comments are moderated, which means that they will not appear immediately upon their being posted.

About the Journal

JIPLP is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to intellectual property law and practice. Published monthly, coverage includes the full range of substantive IP topics, practice-related matters such as litigation, enforcement, drafting and transactions, plus relevant aspects of related subjects such as competition and world trade law.

The journal is specifically designed for IP lawyers, patent attorneys and trade mark attorneys both in private practice and working in industry. It also aims to be an essential source of reference for academics specialising in IP, members of the judiciary, officials in IP registries and regulatory bodies, and institutional libraries. Subject-matter covered is chosen for its practical relevance and international interest.

Instructions for authors here
Free sample issue here
Subscription details here

... and authors in search of an article

JIPLP is often approached by prospective authors who would like to write something, but who would appreciate guidance regarding subject-matter, style and so forth. Here are a few pointers:

* Ask yourself what is it that you'd like to read in the journal, since that is handy rule of thumb which probably reflects the interests of your colleagues and your competitors;

* IP law and practice is very much a 'here and now' activity for JIPLP subscribers. The history of a right may be inherently interesting, or even sometimes relevant to the resolution of a specific issue, but would you expect a reader to look for it in JIPLP?

* Recycled Masters' dissertations and university essays make poor articles and are often difficult to convert from a piece that is designed to display erudition and research ability into an article that addresses lawyers, businesses and decision-makers. It's usually easier to start afresh by working out who your readers are and what you want to tell them.

* Please comply with the authors' instructions and note the journal's preferred length for articles. Most authors like to publish long ones, but subscribers tend to prefer reading shorter ones.

JIPLP

July issue available onlne -- and here are the contents

Guest Editorial

The German ‘Google Tax’ law: groovy or greedy?

Current Intelligence

Trade marks: Gold Bear wars

MOST(ly) Pralines—Bundesgerichtshof further clarifies its guidance on keyword advertising

Land ownership is no excuse for fraudulent trade mark filing

Online uploads by the Trade Marks Registry: Indian High Court rejects constructive notice approach

‘Ugly can be beautiful’ but can't be a trade mark: the case of Crocs shoes

‘DISCOVERY HISTORY’ TV channel does not infringe ‘THE HISTORY CHANNEL’

The value of evidence from witnesses identified using witness gathering surveys

Amazon's use of term ‘appstore’ is not deceptive

Copyright: Reverse engineering and copyright in programming languages and data file formats

Databases: Liability of data providers and enablers for downloading infringing but undisplayed material

General: Dexilant not an ‘innovative drug’ under Canada's Food and Drug Regulations

Articles

The fragmentation of intermediary liability in the UK

Is there a role for Euro-defences following Sun v M-Tech?

A comparative analysis of the inventive step standard in the EPO, SIPO and USPTO

Reconfiguring trade mark law

Novelty of selection inventions: case law on ‘narrow’, ‘sufficiently far removed’ and ‘purposive selection’

From GRUR Int.

No escape from being sued abroad

Trade marks: Patenting neural precursor cells obtained from human embryonic stem cells—Neural Precursor Cells II

IP in Review

Africa rising

IP at the crossroads of trade: A survey of contemporary issues?

At long last, a decent analysis of private copying

Everything you ever needed to know about trade dress

No comments:

Post a Comment