Rhys is a barrister who works at the Office, and who therefore has had the opportunity to study OHIM legal decision-making at close quarters. He is not however the only person who holds views of this nature. David Keeling, currently a Board of Appeal member at the European Patent Office but previously with the OHIM Boards of Appeal, agrees with him and calls for a debate on the "deluded belief" of many lawyers that the application of the right rule to the right facts delivers the right result. He explains:
"Rhys Morgan’s article on legal formalism is possibly the best article on the subject of trade mark law since Frank Schechter’s seminal piece published in the Harvard Law Journal in 1927. It should be compulsory reading for the President and senior managers of OHIM, their equivalents in the Member States, the judges at the European Court of Justice and General Court, judges in national courts in the EU, and anyone else with an interest in trade mark law ...
. ... I find it astonishing that people can spend years at university studying law and come away with the deluded belief that law can be reduced to a set of simple rules and formulas and that for each legal problem there is a single correct solution that can be reached by carefully applying those rules and formulas. Surely Oliver Wendell Holmes demonstrated the folly of such an idea when he wrote “The life of the law has not been logic; it has been experience”".David's fully articulated thoughts on the subject can be read here.
No comments:
Post a Comment